Subtle Changes in Russian Digital Street After Kherson Defeat
Over the last few months, every defeat has been met with excuses. The withdrawal from Kyiv was we never intended to take it. The withdrawal from Kharkiv was a repositioning of forces. Snake Island was a gesture of goodwill. This is now called a defeat.
There is a subtle change in how this war is getting perceived. Moscow Calling, a nationalist with a closer grasp on reality, offered this yesterday:
In one of Z-channels I met an interesting idea. It is interesting not by its content, but by the attempt to invent something to stay in that picture of the world, which is now irreversibly destroyed.
It’s dawning on many Russians that the Federation is not a superpower. Whether its nuclear arsenal still works is a question for intelligence agencies. But the Russian bear, it turns out, is a starving bear cub.
> So here is the thought. Suppose that in all wars Russia has almost always “got into trouble”, and then it became stern in the face, shook itself up and returned everything to its attackers. So this time, too, the scenario will be scrappy and fully in line with tradition.
I am seeing some of this in a few channels. But in other wars, when things went bad, we shook ourselves up and in the end persevered. This is the story of the Great…