Kamala Harris, History and Russia.

First, let me admit this: I am terrified. Why? It’s history. Every time a Democrat stepped down during a campaign in the 20th century, Democrats lost. That’s just a fact that you can take to the bank.

Unless you can cite the Adlai Stevenson or the Hubert Humphrey presidency. This is the latest horse change in the middle of a campaign.

But you knew it was coming; her chances are likely fifty-fifty. It has to do with who the Republicans are running. They will become less if Democrats shoot themselves in the foot and go to the Chicago 1968 convention. Chances of that are lessening by the hour, but I will not breathe easier until the party officially nominates her in four weeks.

The less drama, the better. Yes, Congressman Jamie Raskin, I am talking to you.

I will stand by what I said. This was a soft coup from the power brokers inside the Democratic Party and the corporate-controlled media that ran a very successful information operation. At least we now know we are capable of it. I suppose that’s a good thing. So how is this playing in Russia? Here you go. The first out of the bat is MO. Mind you, they are reading our press, which at this point seems disappointed Democrats are rallying around Harris:

“Kamala cop” versus “criminal”. How Trump’s new rival brought intrigue back to the…